Fuel Economy on the 50

Posts about mechanical systems on a Telstar, including the outboard engine.

Moderator: Ron

Fuel Economy on the 50

Postby vancouver » Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:29 pm

I am just back from a trip to Desolation Sound and as always it was spectacular. This time of year it is a little chilly, but also very uncrowded.

What was less satisfying was the gas consumption. I have dialed my speed way back, running at 2200 giving me about 4.5 knots. I am still using about 1.5 gallons per hour. I know it is a sailboat, but PNW winds don't always agree. My problem, besides the cost, is carrying enough fuel for the trips I plan latter in the summer.

How does the economy of the 20 compare. Tohatsu has a 9.8 with remote and power tilt. Has anyone tried an engine that small?

thanks.
vancouver
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:58 pm
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia

Fuel Economy on the 50

Postby JoeWalling » Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:54 pm

Hi. I have an older Telstar a Mark 2 from 1978 and a much heavier boat I imagine. I have a 9.8 Tohatsu with electric start. I have never felt I needed more power - pushes the boat along at 5 knots or more without every seeming stressed.

Joe
JoeWalling
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:33 am

Fuel Economy on the 50

Postby Ron » Tue Jun 05, 2012 4:21 pm

1.5 gallons per hour seems high, even for the 50hp Honda. My 20 hp usually gets somewhat less than .5 gallons an hour at 4000 rpm, which usually translates to around 6 to 6.5 knots depending on conditions. I can easily break 8 knots but normally choose not to. 5500 rpm is too much for me.

Is the hull and prop clean? Does the prop have the right pitch for the motor and boat combination? My 20 came thru with a 4 blade 9.5 x 10 pitch prop that was entirely wrong for this application. I replaced it with a 4 blade 10 x 7 5/8 with a significant improvement in performance. Has anyone experimented with the 50hp props yet? I would think that an 8.5 pitch might be better suited for the 50. What does it come with?

10 pitch props usually work best in much lighter power boats that expect to get up to 20 knots top end.
Ron Marcuse
Telstar 28 #59 "Tri-Power"
Ron
 
Posts: 988
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:15 pm
Location: SW Florida & NJ Shore

Fuel Economy on the 50

Postby vancouver » Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:57 pm

Hi Ron,

The fuel use seemed high to me also.

I replaced the original 10 pitch with a 9 two years ago and that improved fuel economy. It still looks brand new with no damage.

I haul out next week and will see the hull condition, but it has been pretty consistent since the bottom was painted two years ago.

I like the .5 per hour.

Terry
vancouver
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:58 pm
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia

Re: Fuel Economy on the 50

Postby sandeb2 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 5:54 am

i wanted fuel injection to avoid ethanol problems with the carbs and 2 years ago when i did it the lightest efi ob was the merc 25/50 at 157 # . now there is a suzuki 15 efi 4s. which is what i would put on it. efi is best fuel economy and most reliable.
Sandy & Debbie Williamson Telstar 8M #254
WORDBoats.com & HeliCat.net & WORDyachts.com S cell:253-376-8273 or 888-387-1963
Spanaway, WA 98387 near Seattle
sandeb2
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:20 pm
Location: Near Seattle WA


Return to Mechanical Systems

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron